YURUNOX · Current FPGA ownership and buyer guide
Who Owns Altera Today?
As of September 5, 2026, an affiliate of Silver Lake controls Altera after acquiring 51% at the September 12, 2025 closing; Intel remains a minority investor. Intel's latest Form 10-Q describes a retained 49% interest, while its 2025 Form 10-K reported 48% ownership at December 27, 2025. Use dated filings when an exact percentage matters.
Direct answer
Who Controls Altera Today?
Intel's Form 8-K records that the transaction closed on September 12, 2025: the purchaser, an affiliate of Silver Lake, acquired 51% of Altera's equity interests for an approximate equity value of $3.3 billion, and Intel retained 49%. Intel's 2025 Form 10-K later says its ownership interest was 48% as of December 27, 2025. The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2026 still describes the interest retained at sale as 49% and reports a $3.2 billion carrying value, but does not state a new as-of ownership percentage in that passage. closing 8-K 2025 10-K Q2 2026 10-Q
| Your question or condition | Current answer / action | Minimum evidence | Stop or interpretation boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who controls Altera? | A Silver Lake affiliate is the majority owner and controller; the closing position was 51%. | September 2025 closing Form 8-K, governing-structure disclosure and later Intel reporting. | Do not treat 51% as an unqualified current fully diluted percentage or replace the partnership agreement with the short answer. |
| Does Intel still own Altera? | Yes, as a minority investor. Closing retention was 49%; Intel later reported 48% ownership at December 27, 2025. | Intel 2025 Form 10-K and June 2026 Form 10-Q. | Do not call Intel the controlling parent, claim it has no interest, or conceal the 49% / 48% disclosure difference. |
| Is Altera independent? | Yes in operating-company terms; Altera presents itself as an independent, pure-play FPGA company. | Closing record, Intel deconsolidation analysis, and current Altera company page. | Independent does not mean every manufacturing, service, or investor tie to Intel ended. |
| Are you updating manufacturer master data? | Apply ADV2501 to the affected former Intel PSG portfolio and preserve the historical Intel identity as an alias or audit record. | Exact OPN, controlled item/BOM record, ADV2501, and current Altera documentation. | Do not merge unlike OPNs, product states, approvals, or supplier records under one name change. |
| Does a reel still show Intel? | Investigate the full record; an Intel identifier can be legitimate during the transition. | OPN, top-mark format, label, lot/date trace, packaging, seller and current Altera guidance. | Quarantine when identity fields conflict, alteration is suspected, or provenance is inadequate. |
| Does ownership prove seller authorization? | No. Verify the legal seller and its current authorization scope separately. | Altera's current distributor list, written confirmation where needed, quote, invoice route and traceability. | Stop if a seller uses corporate ownership as a substitute for source-chain evidence. |
Safe one-sentence answer: “Silver Lake is Altera's majority owner and controller, Intel remains a minority investor, and Altera operates as an independent private FPGA company; the September 12, 2025 closing split was 51% / 49%, while Intel later reported 48% ownership at 2025 year-end.”
Intel's remaining interest
What Does Intel's Remaining Minority Stake Mean?
Intel still owns a significant minority interest, but it no longer wholly owns or controls Altera. A Silver Lake affiliate controls the company, Altera operates independently, and Intel accounts for its retained interest under the equity method. For purchasing work, keep company ownership separate from the manufacturer name, product brand, legal seller and support path.
The transaction documents name SLP VII Gryphon Aggregator, L.P., a Silver Lake affiliate, as the purchaser. The closing record supports the plain-language conclusion that the Silver Lake side controls Altera.
Intel retained 49% at closing and later reported 48% ownership at 2025 year-end. Either way, Intel is a minority investor rather than Altera's controlling parent.
Altera runs the FPGA business and describes itself as an independent, pure-play FPGA company. It can still buy wafers or services from Intel.
ADV2501 asked customers to convert affected former Intel PSG products in their systems to Altera Semiconductor Technology Inc.
Altera is the current brand, while legitimate Intel names or logos can remain on transition-era products, labels and documents.
The invoicing seller may be authorized, independent or an intermediary. Its status must be verified for the exact transaction.
Record rule: Write “Silver Lake-controlled, with Intel remaining a minority investor” in a current corporate profile. If percentages are required, label 51% / 49% as the closing split and disclose Intel's later 48% year-end statement. In a PO, ERP, AVL, warranty or receiving record, use the exact manufacturer and legal seller identities required by your quality system—then preserve historical aliases for traceability.
Why percentages differ
Why Is Intel's Ownership Reported as Both 49% and 48%?
The figures refer to different disclosure dates. Separating the signed agreement, legal closing and later financial reporting prevents an old announcement—or one percentage without its date—from being treated as the complete current record.
Intel announced a definitive agreement to sell 51% to Silver Lake at a stated $8.75 billion business valuation. This proved signed intent, not completed ownership. announcement
Intel's Form 8-K records completion: 51% acquired, 49% retained, and the interests contributed to a new limited partnership. This is the decisive change-of-ownership evidence.
Intel's 2025 Form 10-K says its ownership interest was 48% at December 27, 2025, while the Q2 2026 Form 10-Q still describes the transaction as retaining a 49% interest. Together they confirm a continuing minority stake, but they do not justify presenting one unqualified current exact percentage.
Freshness rule: A filing is strong evidence for its reporting date, not a permanent guarantee. Recheck Intel's latest 10-Q or 10-K and Altera's current company records whenever the page is refreshed or a transaction depends on the answer.
Is Altera Publicly Traded?
No. Altera is privately held and has no separate public ticker as of this page's September 5, 2026 check date. The former ALTR listing was removed after Intel completed its acquisition in 2015. Intel trades as INTC, but an Intel share is not a directly traded Altera share. 2015 Altera 8-K
Read old records by date
When Did Altera's Ownership and Operating Status Change?
2015: Intel Acquires Altera
Altera becomes part of Intel and operates as Intel's Programmable Solutions Group. Intel-era FPGA pages, tools, labels and support references can therefore be historically legitimate. Intel release
2024: Altera Returns as a Standalone Operating Company
Intel announces separation intent in October 2023 and relaunches the Altera brand in February 2024. These were operating and brand milestones while Intel still controlled the business—not proof of the later Silver Lake transaction.
2025: Manufacturer Records Change and a Sale Is Signed
ADV2501 asks customers to update affected former Intel PSG manufacturer records in January. On April 14, Intel and Silver Lake announce a planned 51% / 49% transaction, but the signed agreement does not yet prove that ownership changed.
2025: A Silver Lake Affiliate Acquires Control
The transaction legally closes: the Silver Lake affiliate acquires 51%, Intel retains 49%, and Intel deconsolidates Altera. This is the decisive change-of-control date.
2026: Intel Continues Reporting a Minority Investment
Intel's 2025 Form 10-K reports 48% ownership at December 27, 2025. Its Q2 2026 Form 10-Q still describes the retained deal interest as 49% and reports the investment's carrying value, without stating a new exact as-of percentage in that passage.
Chronology test: Ask whether a source describes a brand relaunch, an operating separation, a signed agreement, a completed closing or later financial reporting. Those are not interchangeable milestones.
Transaction figures in context
What Do the $8.75 Billion, $3.3 Billion and $3.2 Billion Figures Mean?
These figures answer different transaction or accounting questions. None changes the disclosed 51% / 49% closing split, and none resolves Intel's later 48% year-end ownership disclosure. None should be presented as Altera's current public-market value.
| Published figure | Official context | Safe interpretation | Do not call it |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.75 billion | April 14, 2025 agreement announcement. | The announced valuation of Altera as a business in the planned transaction. | The simple cash price paid for 51%, Intel's net proceeds, or a current market cap. |
| Approximately $3.3 billion | September 12, 2025 closing Form 8-K. | The approximate equity value associated with the purchaser's acquisition of 51% at closing. | The whole-company transaction valuation. |
| $3.2 billion | Intel reporting at December 27, 2025 and June 27, 2026. | The carrying value of Intel's non-marketable equity-method investment. | A quoted share price, a market capitalization, a direct price for Altera stock or proof of a current exact ownership percentage. |
Financial boundary: Enterprise or business valuation, equity value, consideration, accounting gain and investment carrying value are different measures. This page is an ownership and buyer-control guide, not investment, tax or valuation advice.
Customer meaning
What Does the Ownership Change Mean for Altera Customers?
The ownership change determines corporate control; it does not automatically change an FPGA's OPN, qualification, software compatibility, seller authorization or lot authenticity. Customers should update each record only against the official document and approval that governs that record.
Intel's post-closing accounting says it is not the primary beneficiary of the Altera variable-interest entity because the governance structure does not allow Intel to direct the activities that most significantly affect Altera's economic performance. Intel therefore deconsolidated Altera and accounts for its minority interest under the equity method. Q1 2026 10-Q
Independence does not erase commercial relationships. Intel's June 2026 filing says it provides semiconductor wafer-manufacturing services to Altera under a wafer manufacturing and sale agreement. It also describes interim transition services. Those are investor, foundry and service relationships—not proof that Intel still controls Altera.
Use 51% / 49% for the closing structure, then retain the later 48% Intel year-end disclosure in any percentage-specific analysis.
Use Altera's current site and leadership page for how the business presents and runs itself.
Record the relationship as a commercial related-party arrangement, not parent-company control.
Checked on Altera's current leadership page on September 5, 2026; recheck before using the name in a future update.
A current building sign, website or product brand can confirm how a company presents itself. It cannot replace SEC filings, the closing record or governing documents when the decision requires exact ownership and control.
Use the same separation when reviewing FPGA material: a recognizable logo can support identity, but only a consistent source, OPN, lot, label, packaging and release record can support a lot-level decision.
Company Ownership Does Not Prove Seller Authorization
A Silver Lake ownership statement, an Intel relationship or an Altera logo does not establish that a particular legal seller is authorized for the product, geography or transaction. Confirm the seller independently through current Altera channel information, written transaction records, warranty terms and traceability appropriate to the application.
Customer-facing transition
Which Manufacturer, Label and Top-Mark Records Changed?
ADV2501: Manufacturer-Name Transition
Altera issued Customer Advisory ADV2501 on January 15, 2025, before the Silver Lake transaction closed. It asked customers to convert affected former Intel PSG products in their systems to Altera Semiconductor Technology Inc. It also described several items as unchanged at that stage and warned that Intel identifiers could remain during the transition. Later PCNs, PDNs, advisories, data sheets or contracts can supersede that snapshot. ADV2501
| Record or process | January 2025 advisory position | Buyer action now | Failure boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer master data | Convert affected former Intel PSG products to Altera Semiconductor Technology Inc. | Use controlled change management; keep the historical Intel identity as an alias or audit record. | Do not silently merge unlike OPNs, lifecycle states or customer approvals. |
| Products and data sheets | No change was stated at that time. | Retrieve the latest Altera-hosted document and record number, revision and date. | Do not treat a January 2025 statement as a permanent no-change guarantee. |
| Facilities, BOM, marking, traceability and labeling | No change was stated. | Check later PCN/PDN/ADV records and lot-specific evidence. | Escalate an unexplained difference rather than approving it informally. |
| OPNs, shipment and packing labels | No change was stated. | Preserve the complete OPN; require any suffix or label difference to be explained before release. | Do not accept a family-level match when the orderable suffix differs. |
| Support and notifications | Support, PCN, PDN and ADV distribution were described as unchanged. | Use current Altera support, documentation and notification routes; confirm warranty/RMA responsibility in the purchase channel. | Do not rely only on an old Intel URL or distributor summary. |
| Intel names and logos | Some could continue on product top marks, labels and documents. | Reconcile the identifier with OPN, label, lot, source, packing and current official records. | A plausible transition explanation does not override contradictory evidence or signs of alteration. |
ADV2602: Packaging-Label Changes
ADV2501 described the January 2025 transition state, not a permanent freeze. ADV2602 later changed standard inner-box and moisture-barrier-bag label content across Altera products. Updated labels could begin shipping March 2, 2026, and old and new formats may coexist. Match the complete device to the official ADV2602 affected-OPN list.
ADV2605: Top-Mark Changes on Selected Parts
ADV2605 removed the Intel name and logo from top marks on selected Stratix 10, Cyclone 10, Agilex 7 and Agilex 9 Direct RF products. Updated marks could begin shipping March 16, 2026, while old-mark inventory can continue until depleted. Neither ADV2602 nor ADV2605 says the OPN itself changed. Check the ADV2605 affected-OPN list before applying the notice.
| Notice | Scope and earliest updated shipment | Visible change | Buyer boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADV2602 all products | All Altera inner-box and moisture-barrier-bag labels; earliest updated labels March 2, 2026. | INTEL becomes ALTERA; supplier field removed; manufacturing-lot field added; country fields reorganized. Old and new labels can be mixed during transition. | A changed label does not mean the OPN changed, and the label alone does not prove origin or authenticity. Reconcile the exact fields and commercial documents. |
| ADV2605 v1.1 selected OPNs | Selected Stratix 10, Cyclone 10, Agilex 7 and Agilex 9 Direct RF products; earliest updated top marks March 16, 2026. | Intel name/logo removed and Altera or ALTERA marking standardized. Old and new top marks can ship until old inventory is depleted. | There is no universal date after which every Intel logo is invalid. Check the affected-OPN list and current family top-mark specification. |
A notice that names Cyclone 10 or Agilex does not automatically cover every device in that family. Match the complete orderable part number to the notice's affected-OPN list and then use the current marking specification for that device.
Stop: If the full OPN, suffix, notice list, top-mark layout or label fields cannot be reconciled, pause the PO or quarantine receipt and obtain written clarification from Altera, the authorized channel or the responsible quality authority.
Software boundary: Corporate ownership alone does not determine Quartus Prime compatibility, device support, IP licensing or design migration. Use the exact software release notes, device-support matrix, errata and licensed project configuration for the released design.
Receiving and sourcing
Can Genuine Altera Components Still Carry Intel Branding?
Buyers can legitimately encounter pre-2015 Altera records, Intel FPGA or Intel PSG branding from the Intel-owned period, the relaunched Altera brand, and mixed transition records. Accepting or rejecting by logo alone ignores the exact OPN, source, lot and document history.
Short answer: Yes, Intel branding can still be legitimate in the transition record. It explains why a mark may exist; it does not authenticate a specific component lot.
When Old and New Labels or Top Marks May Coexist
| Observed evidence | Plausible explanation | Minimum confirmation | Stop / escalate when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel logo on device | Intel-era stock may be legitimate; ADV2605 allows old and new top marks to coexist for selected products until old inventory is depleted. | Exact OPN, ADV2605 affected list where applicable, current top-mark layout, package, lot/date trace, seller and purchase records. | Mark conflicts with official format, shows alteration or cannot be reconciled to the OPN and lot. |
| Intel name on packing label | ADV2501 allowed continuing Intel identifiers; ADV2602 later introduced updated ALTERA labels and permits mixed old/new labels. | PO, exact ADV2602 fields, quantity, seal, MSL/dry-pack data, reel or tray and source documents. | Label conflicts with the actual carrier, quantity, OPN, lot fields or traceability chain. |
| Altera in ERP, Intel in old AVL | Systems may have migrated at different times. | Controlled name-change record linked to ADV2501 and preserved audit history. | The update merges different part numbers, qualifications, sources or customer approvals. |
| Intel-hosted data sheet | Legacy resources remained available during migration. | Latest Altera-hosted version, document number, revision, scope and errata comparison. | The older file omits a later notice, limit, lifecycle status or ordering change. |
| Seller says “Intel/Altera” | The seller may be using a familiar alias. | Exact manufacturer, OPN, legal seller, authorization, warranty route and provenance in writing. | The seller avoids exact identities or cannot support provenance appropriate to the application. |
When Buyers Should Quarantine the Lot
Hold the lot when the top mark, manufacturer label, OPN, package, quantity, lot/date information, seal or traceability records conflict—or when there are signs of remarking, relabeling, damage or an unexplained suffix change. Resume only after the responsible quality authority receives enough consistent evidence to apply the defined acceptance criteria.
Use Altera's current authorized distributor list as one source-status input. A distributor name still needs geographic and product-line scope, an actual legal selling entity and transaction documents. For independent stock, align the lot-specific evidence and inspection scope before payment or shipment through a documented component quality-assurance process.
Buyer workflow
Which ERP, AVL, PO and Receiving Records Must Buyers Update?
This seven-step workflow is suitable for a new quote, ERP conversion, AVL review or receiving discrepancy. Scale inspection and testing to the application, source, lot value, age, storage history and consequence of failure.
Record the full Altera OPN and suffix, internal item, BOM revision, application, site and historical Intel PSG alias. Do not start with a product-family nickname.
Retrieve the current product page, data sheet, ordering information, errata, package data, lifecycle record and relevant PCN, PDN or ADV notices.
Record the legal seller, authorization status and scope, intermediaries, warranty/RMA path, Incoterm, quantity, packing, source restrictions and no-substitute requirement.
When risk warrants it, obtain unedited representative photos of outer labels, inner labels, seals, carrier and components. Keep quantity and lot identity visible.
Name the sample identity and count, method, equipment, conditions, units, applicable drawing or data-sheet revision, acceptance limits, failure boundary and release authority. No universal sample count fits every application.
Route an unapproved suffix, mark, label, package or manufacturer-name difference to engineering, quality and procurement. A buyer or seller cannot approve the technical effect alone.
Retain the as-of date, official URLs and revisions, quote, PO, seller acknowledgment, label photos, traceability, inspection or test results, deviation and release approval.
Two separate conclusions are required: “Who controls the company?” comes from transaction and financial records. “Can we buy and release this lot?” comes from the exact OPN, seller, source chain, documents, physical evidence, inspection or testing and authorized release.
Interactive decision aid
Choose the Altera Record You Need to UpdateSelect the decision. The result names the controlling evidence and the point where the short ownership answer is no longer enough.
September 12, 2025 closing Form 8-K, Intel's 48% year-end disclosure, and its June 2026 report of the continuing minority investment.
Do not use an agreement-stage announcement or undated company profile as the only current record.
Sourcing decision
How Should Buyers Verify an Altera Sourcing Offer?
Start with the exact OPN and legal seller, then choose evidence that addresses the actual risk. Corporate ownership explains who controls Altera; it does not approve a supplier, authenticate a lot or release material for production.
| Offer or condition | Buyer action | Minimum evidence | Stop boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authorized-channel offer | Confirm the actual legal selling entity, geography and product-line scope. | Current Altera channel information, quote, PO acknowledgment, warranty/RMA route and traceability terms. | Do not rely on a familiar distributor name when the invoicing entity or authorization scope is unclear. |
| Independent stock with the exact OPN | Define the source, condition and lot-release evidence before payment or shipment. | Ownership and location, acquisition trace, unedited label and carrier photos, lot/date data, storage and packing evidence, return terms and a risk-based inspection or test plan. | Do not release the lot when provenance is inadequate, anomalies remain unresolved or defined acceptance criteria fail. |
| Intel / Altera identity mismatch | Reconcile the full OPN against ADV2501, ADV2602, ADV2605 and the current family marking specification. | OPN, affected-part list, top mark, manufacturer label, carrier, seal, quantity, lot/date trace and purchase records. | Quarantine when the records conflict, alteration is suspected or the difference lacks an authorized explanation. |
| Seller cites Altera ownership as authenticity proof | Separate the corporate statement from transaction and lot evidence. | Legal seller, source chain, authorization status, manufacturer or channel documents, physical evidence and release criteria. | Ownership alone is insufficient evidence of authorization, provenance, authenticity or product suitability. |
Clearly labeled examples
How Do Buyers Apply These Records in Common Sourcing Situations?
These clearly labeled illustrative cases show how evidence changes a decision. They are teaching scenarios—not Altera statements, YURUNOX transactions, customer outcomes or first-hand inspection reports.
A 2024 Article Still Says Intel Owns Altera
The article was accurate for its date: Intel had relaunched the Altera brand, but the Silver Lake agreement had not yet been signed. The analyst checks the April 2025 agreement, September 2025 closing filing, 2025 Form 10-K and June 2026 quarterly record. The updated profile becomes “Silver Lake-controlled; Intel remains a minority investor; the September 12, 2025 closing split was 51% / 49%, and Intel later reported 48% ownership at 2025 year-end.”
Stop boundary: Do not rewrite a current company profile from the 2024 brand launch alone.
An Authorized-Channel Reel Arrives with an Intel Logo
The team does not reject by logo alone. It matches the PO and full OPN, compares the manufacturer label and official marking guidance, checks lot/date trace, reel and dry-pack condition, and confirms the source documents. If the identity package reconciles, the historical mark can be accepted under the organization's controlled transition rule. If it does not, the lot remains quarantined.
Stop boundary: ADV2501 explains possible Intel identifiers; it does not excuse inconsistent OPNs, altered marks, broken traceability or failed acceptance criteria.
A Seller Uses Altera Ownership as Authenticity Proof
The buyer separates company context from lot evidence and requests the legal seller, exact OPN, quantity, stock location, date/lot information, packaging photos, acquisition trace, warranty terms and available manufacturer or authorized-channel documents. Quality assigns a risk-based inspection or test plan with defined sample identity, methods, conditions and pass/fail limits.
Stop boundary: If provenance and testing cannot reduce risk to the level authorized for the application, do not release the lot.
Evidence request
What Evidence Is Needed Before an Altera Sourcing Review?
- Complete Altera OPN, including speed, package, temperature and packing suffixes
- Quantity, need-by date, destination, application class and affected BOM revision
- Current Altera product page, data sheet, errata and lifecycle status
- Applicable PCN, PDN and ADV records, including ADV2501 where relevant
- Required Quartus Prime version, device support, IP and licensing context
- Legal seller, source chain, authorization scope and written warranty/RMA route
- Unedited outer-label, inner-label, seal, reel/tray and component photos
- Lot/date codes, traceability, packing, MSL/dry-pack and storage evidence
- Inspection or test method, sample identity/count, conditions, units and limits
- Customer, regulatory, safety, configuration and deviation approval constraints
Make the next review specific
Send the OPN and the Evidence Gap—Not Just “Intel or Altera?”For a structured sourcing review, send the complete Altera OPN, quantity and need-by date; application and BOM revision; required source status; legal seller; Intel/Altera label and top-mark photos; lot/date and traceability records; packaging and MSL condition; current data-sheet, PCN/PDN/ADV and Quartus context; destination; and your inspection, customer or regulatory constraints.
Traceable references
Which Official Records Confirm Altera's Ownership and Product Changes?
- Intel Form 8-K, event dated September 12, 2025 — transaction completion; purchaser acquired 51%, Intel retained 49%, approximate $3.3 billion equity value for the acquired stake.
- Intel Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2026, filed July 24, 2026 — continuing minority investment described by reference to the retained 49% deal interest, $3.2 billion carrying value, wafer-manufacturing and transition-service relationships.
- Intel 2025 Form 10-K, filed January 23, 2026 — 49% retained at closing, 48% ownership reported as of December 27, 2025, equity-method accounting and deconsolidation.
- Intel Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2026 — equity-method treatment and Intel's conclusion that it is not the primary beneficiary.
- Intel Form 8-K, event dated April 14, 2025 — transaction signing and the legal purchaser, SLP VII Gryphon Aggregator, L.P., identified as a Silver Lake affiliate.
- Intel / Silver Lake agreement announcement, April 14, 2025 — signed 51% transaction, stated $8.75 billion business valuation and planned 49% Intel retention.
- Silver Lake completion announcement, September 15, 2025 — completed 51% acquisition, Intel 49%, Altera's independent operating presentation.
- Altera current company and product overview — current independent, pure-play FPGA positioning and product/documentation routes; checked September 5, 2026.
- Altera leadership page — Raghib Hussain listed as President & CEO; checked September 5, 2026.
- Altera Customer Advisory ADV2501, January 15, 2025 — manufacturer master-data transition and the initial status of products, OPNs, marks, labels, support and notices.
- Altera Customer Advisory ADV2602, January 30, 2026 — standard inner-box and moisture-barrier-bag label changes for all Altera products, earliest updated shipment March 2, 2026, and permitted mixed old/new labels.
- Altera Customer Advisory ADV2605 v1.1, February 2026 — Intel name/logo removal from selected product top marks, earliest updated shipment March 16, 2026, and permitted old/new mark overlap.
- Intel completes acquisition of Altera, December 28, 2015 — historical ownership transition into Intel PSG.
- Altera Form 8-K, December 28, 2015 — merger completion and request to remove ALTR from Nasdaq listing and registration.
- Intel announces intent to operate PSG as a standalone business, October 3, 2023 — historical separation plan, not transaction closing.
- Intel launches the Altera standalone FPGA company brand, February 29, 2024 — brand/operating milestone before the Silver Lake agreement.
- Altera products and documentation routes, quality and reliability portal, and PCN, PDN and ADV portal — current paths for product, errata, release-note, package and change evidence.
Scope and disclosure: This page answers the global corporate-ownership question as checked on September 5, 2026 and explains buyer controls. It is not legal, investment, tax, export-control, warranty, authenticity, product-lifecycle or engineering-approval advice. YURUNOX is an independent electronic-component sourcing partner, not Altera, Intel or Silver Lake, and not the manufacturer of the products discussed.